Posted: 9:08 a.m. Tuesday
Updated: 2:57 p.m. Tuesday
Updated: 2:57 p.m. Tuesday
NC Court of Appeals reverses ruling that freed Durham man from prison
- Court of Appeals reverses ruling that freed Durham man
- State v. Allen
- Judge: SBI report was 'intentionally misleading'
- State appeals dismissed Durham murder case
- Prosecutors worry SBI troubles will lead to more dismissed cases
- Murder charge dismissed for Durham man
- Durham man out on bond after decade in prison
- Man denies harming 2-year-old who died
Site Search
RALEIGH, N.C. — The state Court of Appeals on Tuesday reversed a ruling that dismissed the case against Derrick Michael Allen, a Durham man who spent 12 years in prison for the murder and sexual assault of a toddler.
The appeals court concluded that Durham County Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson erred when he threw out Allen’s case in 2010. Hudson had agreed with the defense's contention that the State Bureau of Investigation violated Allen’s rights by not sharing everything it found in blood tests.
But in his opinion, Appeals Court Judge Sam Ervin IV sided with prosecutors, who said the trial court made certain findings of fact without adequate evidence and was wrong to conclude Allen's constitutional rights were violated.
Allen's case was among 200 cases that an outside audit said were mishandled by the SBI. The audit revealed agents failed to report correct blood evidence in the cases.
In his opinion Monday, Ervin emphasized that his decision should not be mistaken for an approval of how the state gathered its evidence.
"On the contrary, we share the trial court's displeasure with the manner in which the blood testing results were disclosed to the defendant and the manner in which aspects of the prosecution of this case have been handled," Ervin wrote. "Even so, given our inability to discern any legal basis for the sanction imposed in the trial court's order, we are obligated to reverse it."
The appeals court has remanded the case back to Durham
No comments:
Post a Comment