Showing posts with label Loughlin(Fernando). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Loughlin(Fernando). Show all posts

Monday, 2 May 2011

AHT: California: Fernando Loghlin sentenced

Paul T. Rosynsky
 04/22/2011

OAKLAND -- When Fernando Loughlin called 911 after his 3-month-old son stopped breathing, he told the operator that his son was alone and asleep when he noticed the baby's breathing had stopped. He told paramedics the same story and initially told police that he had no idea what had happened to his son Julian on the morning of March 3, 2007.
It wasn't until Loughlin, 36, was told that his son was suffering from massive head trauma, and that a doctor at Children's Hospital Oakland believed it was caused by child abuse, that Loughlin broke down in tears and told police that he accidentally dropped Julian in the bathtub.
For those lies, Loughlin was sentenced Friday to prison for two years after agreeing to a surprising deal in which he pleaded no contest and was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for the death of Julian.
Loughlin contends that he never intentionally hurt his child but said he initially lied about what happened because he was fearful his son would be taken from him and his wife.
It was a series of lies his attorney William Locke said Friday that will haunt Loughlin for the rest of his life.
"Certainly, he made that lie and he kept it up, that is something that he will regret for as long as he lives," Locke said. "He was deeply wrong."
The lies also prove that he was not acting in a reasonable manner when he reacted to dropping his son in the bathtub and for that he should serve prison time, Alameda
County Superior Court Judge Gloria Rhynes said.
"This is not the way that parents should conduct themselves," Rhynes said just before she sent Loughlin to prison as about 15 of his friends and family cried. "I, in no way, want Mr. Loughlin to believe in his own mind that he should be absolved."
Julian's death occurred the morning of March 3, 2007, after Loughlin had bathed him. According to Loughlin's attorney, Loughlin was in the process of lifting Julian out of the bathtub when an older son rushed into the bathroom and attempted to jump into the bath.
With one arm cradling Julian, Locke said, Loughlin tried to keep his older son from getting into the tub but in the process dropped Julian, who hit his head on the ceramic tub and a plastic infant bath seat.
The fall caused massive trauma to Julian's skull and matched the injuries many doctors say are caused by shaken baby syndrome.
But instead of immediately calling 911 and telling the truth, Loughlin attempted to hide his mistake by dressing his dead baby and then initially claiming that he did not know what happened.
The injuries suffered by Julian coupled with Loughlin's original lies convinced James Crawford of Children's Hospital Oakland that Julian was a victim of child abuse. Crawford's opinions then persuaded the district attorney's office to file murder charges.
But Locke was prepared to challenge Crawford's findings and present a cadre of character witnesses showing that Loughlin had never exhibited any violent tendencies toward his children.
Locke never had an opportunity to present his case because Loughlin agreed to the plea deal after just one day of testimony. At the time, Locke said the deal was made to avoid the risk of Loughlin being sent to prison for the rest of his life and because his older son had just been diagnosed with a return of leukemia after it was in remission for two years. Under the deal, Loughlin was allowed to remain free on bail until the sentencing Friday.
Deputy district attorney Tim Wellman, who began to try the case and then later accepted the plea, said the resolution of the case without a full trial was fair. At the time of the plea deal Wellman said the case had conflicting medical evidence and that the deal would guarantee that Loughlin is held responsible for Julian's death.
"Parents run into burning buildings to save their children but what did the defendant do? I ask the court to consider that," Wellman said Friday. "It is clear in this case that the defendant put his own self interest in front of his child's health."
Rhynes said she agreed to sentence Loughlin to the minimum two years in prison for involuntary manslaughter because of the conflicting medical evidence and the testimony that was expected to be presented during the trial showing that Loughlin had no criminal record and was supported by his wife, other family and friends.
But she said Loughlin could not be let free because he did not act as he should have after dropping his baby in the bathtub.
"We do know that Fernando Loughlin put in place a chain of events that led to his child's death including making a series of lies," the judge said. "That is not the act of a conscientious parent, that is not the act of a devoted parent."
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_17911231?nclick_check=1

Friday, 4 February 2011

CALIFORNIA: Fernando Loughlin plea deal

Paul T. Rosynsky
 02/03/2011

OAKLAND — Fernando Loughlin said he didn't kill his son.
It was an accident, Loughlin told police, caused when he was distracted and dropped the 3-month-old baby into the bathtub as he was trying to pick him up.
Loughlin, 36, hoped to convince a jury that the death of Julian Loughlin was a mistake and clear his name from a charge of murder filed against him by a skeptical District Attorney's Office.
Loughlin's attorney was prepared to attack the diagnosis of a Children's Hospital doctor who declared the death a result of a child abuse and had dozens of witnesses, including Loughlin's wife and mother-in-law, standing by to testify as character witnesses on behalf of Loughlin.
But that defense ended Wednesday, after just one day of testimony, when Loughlin agreed to a plea deal that will most likely send him to prison for 10 months.
The unexpected deal was made, said Loughlin's attorney, William Locke, to both avoid the risk of his client spending his life in prison and because Loughlin's older son, a 5-year-old, had just been diagnosed with leukemia return after being in remission for two years.
"My client was facing a life sentence if he was convicted so I understand he has made a rational decision under these circumstances and under these risks," Locke said. "I am disappointed because I am persuaded about his innocence."
Under the deal, Loughlin pleaded no contest to and therefore was found guilty of one count
of involuntary manslaughter with an indication from Alameda County Superior Court Judge Gloria Rhynes that she will sentence him to the minimum two years in prison.
With credits for time served, Loughlin, who will remain free on a $350,000 bail until sentencing in April, will likely serve 10 months in prison.
Locke said the deal will allow Loughlin to be by his older son's hospital bedside as he faces another round of treatment for leukemia. The son must stay in critical care at a hospital for several months.
Deputy district attorney Tim Wellman said his office agreed to the deal because the case had conflicting evidence and the deal guarantees that Loughlin will be held responsible for the death of his child.
"There was going to be conflicting medical evidence, there was going be a lack of certain corroborating evidence, the defendant had no criminal history and no history of abuse on children or others. It was also understood that he had strong family support," Wellman said. "From our perspective we wanted a resolution that would hold him accountable for taking the life of a child and bring certainty to the case."
Wellman's case against Loughlin was based largely on a diagnosis by a Children's Hospital doctor who declared Julian Loughlin's injuries could only be caused by child abuse.
The 3-month-old was brought to hospital with severe brain trauma, broken ribs and a damaged liver.
Wellman also told a jury Monday that he would show that Loughlin initially lied to both a 911 operator and later police about what happened to his son claiming, at first, that the baby was sleeping when he stopped breathing.
Loughlin didn't speak about dropping his son until he was confronted by the opinion of Dr. James Crawford, who specializes in child abuse cases, and who never wavered from his initial diagnosis that Julian suffered child abuse.
But Locke was prepared to challenge the opinions of Crawford with another doctor who has also worked extensively on child abuse cases and who has found fault with the shaken-baby syndrome, a medical diagnosis of child abuse that is now being challenged.
Locke also was going to call Loughlin's friends and family members to the witness stand in hopes of convincing the jury that Loughlin never showed aggression toward his children or others.
Locke said during opening statements that his client initially lied about what happened to his son because he panicked and was scared that he would be found to be an incompetent parent for dropping his son in a bathtub.
"He made a reasonable decision under horrible circumstances," Locke said.
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_17275256?nclick_check=1